Factors that Determine Human Acceptance of Black Bears
Matteo Cleary
Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078 USA
Current affiliation: Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 7386 NW 71st St, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Omkar Joshi
Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorW. Sue Fairbanks
Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078 USA
Search for more papers by this authorMatteo Cleary
Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078 USA
Current affiliation: Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 7386 NW 71st St, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Omkar Joshi
Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorW. Sue Fairbanks
Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078 USA
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
After being extirpated from their historical distribution, black bears (Ursus americanus) have recolonized eastern Oklahoma, USA. As bears continue to establish populations in the region, understanding the cognitive factors that influence human acceptance of black bears will play an important role in facilitating coexistence. We hypothesized that a variety of variables drawing from the cognitive hierarchy and risk perception frameworks would affect human acceptance of black bears in eastern Oklahoma. We collected data using a mail-back questionnaire administered to residents of eastern Oklahoma between August and November 2018. Perceptions of the current black bear population size, attitudes toward bears, valuing Oklahoma wildlife, behavioral intentions, and level of formal education all positively influenced acceptance of bears. Risk-averse respondents and women were less accepting. Outreach to women and encouraging residents to reduce conflict by adopting bear-safe behaviors may help raise acceptance capacity for black bears. © 2021 The Wildlife Society.
LITERATURE CITED
- Agee, J. D., and C. A. Miller. 2009. Factors contributing toward acceptance of lethal control of black bears in central Georgia, USA. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 198–205.
10.1080/10871200902877829 Google Scholar
- Artz, E. J. 2016. Genetic mark-recapture abundance estimate and dietary preferences in a recently re-established population of black bears. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.
- Bender, R., and U. Grouven. 1997. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 31: 546–551.
- Bjerke, T., O. Reitan, and S. R. Kellert. 1998. Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Society and Natural Resources 11: 169–178.
- Bright, A. D., and M. J. Manfredo. 1996. A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues: a case study of wolf reintroduction. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 1–21.
10.1080/10871209609359048 Google Scholar
- Bruskotter, J. T., and R. S. Wilson. 2014. Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters 7: 158–165.
- Byrnes, J. P., D. C. Millerand, and W. D. Schafer. 1999. Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125: 367–383.
- Caplenor, C. A., N. C. Poudyal, L. I. Muller, and C. Yoest. 2017. Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options. Journal of Environmental Management 201: 45–51.
- Carpenter, L. H., D. J. Decker, and J. F. Lipscomb. 2000. Stakeholder acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 5–19.
10.1080/10871200009359184 Google Scholar
- Connelly, N. A., T. L. Brown, and D. J. Decker. 2003. Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused mail surveys: empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society and Natural Resources 16: 541–549.
- Cortina, J. M. 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 98–104.
- Decker, D. J., T. L. Brown, and W. F. Siemer. 2001. Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
- Decker, D. J., and J. O'Pezio. 1989. Consideration of bear-people conflicts in black bear management for the Catskill region of New York: application of a comprehensive management model. Pages 181–187 in M. Bromley, editor. Bear-people conflicts: proceedings of a symposium on management strategies. Northwest Territories Department of Renewable Resources, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
- Decker, D. J., and K. G. Purdy. 1988. Toward a concept of wildlife acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 16: 53–57.
- Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2009. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
- Dougherty, E. M., D. C. Fulton, and D. H. Anderson. 2003. The influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Society and Natural Resources 16: 603–623.
- Ellis, E. C., K. K. Goldewijk, S. Sievert, D. Lightman, and N. Ramankutty. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 589–606.
- Feldman, J. W. 2007. The Leopold report, public opinion, and the reform of federal predator control policy. Human Wildlife Conflicts 1: 12–24.
- Frank, B., J. A. Glikman, and S. Marchini. 2019. Human–wildlife interactions: turning conflict into coexistence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
10.1017/9781108235730 Google Scholar
- Fulton, D. C., M. J. Manfredo, and J. Lipscomb. 1996. Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 24–47.
10.1080/10871209609359060 Google Scholar
- Gehrt, S. D., S. P. D. Riley, and B. L. Cypher. 2010. Urban carnivores: ecology, conflict, and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
10.56021/9780801893896 Google Scholar
- Gigliotti, L., D. J. Decker, and L. H. Carpenter. 2000. Developing the wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity concept: research needed. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 76–82.
10.1080/10871200009359189 Google Scholar
- Gore, M. L., B. A. Knuth, P. D. Curtis, and J. E. Shanahan. 2006. Stakeholder perceptions of risk associated with human-black bear conflicts in New York's Adirondack Park campgrounds: implications for theory and practice. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 36–43.
- Gore, M. L., B. A. Knuth, P. D. Curtis, and J. E. Shanahan. 2007. Factors influencing risk perception associated with human-black bear conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12: 133–136.
10.1080/10871200701195985 Google Scholar
- Gore, M. L., W. F. Siemer, J. E. Shanahan, D. Schuefele, and D. J. Decker. 2005. Effects on risk perception of media coverage of a black bear-related human fatality. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33: 501–516.
- Gore, M. L., R. S. Wilson, W. F. Siemer, H. W. Hudenko, C. E. Clarke, S. P. Hart, L. A. Maguire, and B. A. Muter. 2009. Application of risk concepts to wildlife management: special issue introduction. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 301–313.
10.1080/10871200903160944 Google Scholar
- Heberlein, T. A. 1981. Environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Policy 2: 241–270.
- Hendee, J. C., G. H Stankey, and R. C. Lucas. 1978. Wilderness management. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publications 1365, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Hermand, D., E. Mullet, and L. Rompteaux. 1999. Societal risk perception among children, adolescents, adults, and elderly people. Journal of Adult Development 6: 137–143.
- Hoffman, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dualism: a dialogue with Western European and American Indian views of spirituality, nature, and science. Social Science Journal 34: 447–460.
- Hristienko, H., and J. E. McDonald. 2007. Going into the 21st century: a perspective on trends and controversies in the management of the American black bear. Ursus 18: 72–88.
- Hudenko, H. W. 2012. Exploring the influence of emotion on human decision making in human—wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17: 16–28.
10.1080/10871209.2012.623262 Google Scholar
- Indexmundi. 2020. Oklahoma American Indian and Alaska native population percentage by county. https://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/quick-facts/oklahoma/american-indian-and-alaskan-native-population-percentage#map. Accessed 22 Dec 2020.
- Johnson, E., G. Geisler, and D. Murray. 2010. Oklahoma Forest Resource Assessment. A complete analysis of forest-related conditions, trends, threats, and opportunities. Oklahoma Forestry Services Publications, Oklahoma City, USA.
- Johnson, M. F., K. K. Karanth, and E. Weinthal. 2018. Compensation as a policy for mitigating human-wildlife conflict around four protected areas in Rajasthan, India. Conservation and Society 16: 305–319.
- Kellert, S. R., M. Black, C. R. Rush, and A. J. Bath. 1996. Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America. Conservation Biology 10: 977–990.
- Kleiven, J., T. Bjerke, and B. Kaltenborn. 2004. Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 1647–1658.
- Laliberte, A. S., and W. J. Ripple. 2004. Range contractions of North American carnivores and ungulates. BioScience 54: 123–138.
- Landon, A. C., M. H. Jacobs, C. A. Miller, J. J. Vaske, and B. D. Williams. 2020. Cognitive and affective predictors of Illinois residents' perceived risks from gray wolves. Society & Natural Resources 33: 574–593.
- Lewis, D. L., S. Baruch-Mordo, K. R. Wilson, S. W. Breck, J. S. Mao, and J. Broderick. 2015. Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human-bear conflict mitigation. Ecosphere 6: 1–18.
- Lewis, E. F., M. Hardy, and B. Snaith. 2013. An analysis of survey reporting in the imaging professions: is the issue of non-response bias being adequately addressed? Radiography 19: 240–245.
10.1016/j.radi.2013.02.003 Google Scholar
- Lin, I. F., and N. C. Schaeffer. 1995. Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation. Public Opinion Quarterly 59: 236–258.
- Linnell, J. D., J. E. Swenson, and R. Anderson. 2001. Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Animal Conservation 4: 345–349.
- Lischka, S. A., S. J. Riley, and B. A. Rudolph. 2008. Effects of impact perception on acceptance capacity for white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 722: 502–509.
- Madden, F., and B. McQuinn. 2014. Conservation's blind spot: the case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation 178: 97–106.
- Manfredo, M. J., J. T. Bruskotter, T. L. Teel, D. Fulton, S. H. Schwartz, R. Arlinghaus, S. Oishi, A. K. Uskul, K. Redford, S. Kitayama, et al. 2017. Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conservation Biology 31: 772–780.
- Manfredo, M. J., C. L. Pierce, D. Fulton, J. Pate, and B. R. Gill. 1999. Public acceptance of wildlife trapping in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 272: 499–508.
- Manfredo, M. J., J. J. Vaske, and D. R. Decker. 1995. Human dimensions of wildlife management: basic concepts. Pages 17–31 in R. L. Knight and K. J. Gutzwiller, editors. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Mattson, D. J., and T. Merrill. 2002. Extirpations of grizzly bears in the contiguous United States, 1850–2000. Conservation Biology 16: 1123–1136.
- McDaniels, T., L. J. Axelrod, and P. Slovic. 1996. Perceived ecological risk of global change. Global Environmental Change 6: 159–171.
- McFarlane, B. L., R. C. G. Stumpf-Allen, and D. O. T. Watson. 2007. Public acceptance of restrictions to grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) country. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12: 275–287.
10.1080/10871200701195555 Google Scholar
- Murphy, A. 1996. Simple LM tests of mis-specification for ordered logit models. Economic Letters 52: 137–141.
- Oklahoma Climatological Survey. 2020. Climate of Oklahoma. http://climate.ok.gov/index.php/site/page/climate_of_oklahoma. Accessed 3 Dec 2020.
- Perez, E. L. 2018. Population dynamics and infectious disease seroprevalence in American black bears of southeastern Oklahoma. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.
- Peyton, R., P. Bull, and R. Holsman. 2007. Measuring the social carrying capacity for gray wolves in Michigan. The Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, Michigan, USA.
- Rajecki, D. W. 1990. Attitudes. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
- Rayner, S., and R. Cantor. 1987. How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Analysis 7: 3–9.
- Reiter, D. K., M. W. Brunson, and R. H. Schmidt. 1999. Public attitudes toward wildlife damage management and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 746–758.
- Renn, O. 1992. Concepts of risk: a classification. Pages 55–79 in S. Krimsky and D. Golding, editors. Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, USA.
- Riley, S. J., and D. J. Decker. 2000a. Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 50–62.
10.1080/10871200009359187 Google Scholar
- Riley, S. J., and D. J. Decker. 2000b. Wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 931–939.
- Rokeach, M. 1979. From individual to institutional values: with special reference to the values of science. Pages 47–70 in M. Rokeach, editor. Understanding human values. Free Press, New York, New York, USA.
- Schmidt, R. H., M. W. Brunson, and D. K. Reiter. 1997. National public attitudes toward animal damage management and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 746–758.
- Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Pages 1–66 in M. P. Zanna, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
- Schwartz, S. H., and W. Bilsky. 1987. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 550–562.
- Siemer, W. F., P. S. Hart, D. J. Decker, and J. E. Shanahan. 2009. Factors that influence concern about human-black bear interactions in residential settings. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 185–197.
10.1080/10871200902856138 Google Scholar
- Sijtsma, M. T. J., J. J. Vaske, and M. H. Jacobs. 2012. Acceptability of lethal control of wildlife that damage agriculture in the Netherlands. Society and Natural Resources 25: 1308–1323.
- Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236: 280–285.
- Stedman, R. C., N. A. Connely, T. A. Heberlein, D. J. Decker, and S. B. Allred. 2019. The end of the (research) world as we know it? Understanding and coping with declining response rates to mail surveys. Society and Natural Resources 32: 1139–1154.
- Teel, T. L., and M. J. Manfredo. 2010. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 24: 128–139.
- Tyrl, J. R., T. G. Bidwell, R. Masters, R. Elmore, and J. Weir. 2007. Oklahoma's native vegetation types. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Publication No. E-993, Stillwater, USA.
- United States Census Bureau. 2017. 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Suitland, Maryland, USA. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ok. Accessed 30 Jun 2019.
- United States Forest Service. 2012. Forest Service Geospatial Technology and Applications Center. Forest Service Topographic Map Data. Geospatial Technology and Applications Center, Salt Lake City, USA.
- Vaske, J. J. 2008. Survey research and analysis: applications in parks, recreation, and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
- Wamsley, L. 2020. Supreme Court rule that about half of Oklahoma is Native American land. NPR KOSU. https://www.npr.org/2020/07/09/889562040/supreme-court-rules-that-about-half-of-oklahoma-is-indian-land. Accessed 18 Jul 2020.
- Whittaker, D., J. J. Vaske, and M. J. Manfredo. 2006. Specificity and the cognitive hierarchy: value orientations and the acceptability of urban wildlife management actions. Society and Natural Resources 19: 515–530.
- Williams, R. 1979. Chance and stability in values and value systems: a psychological perspective. Pages 15–46 in M. Rokeach, editor. Understanding human values. Free Press, New York, New York, USA.
- Williams, R. 2006. Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal 6: 58–82.
- Zajac, R. M., J. T. Bruskotter, R. S. Wilson, and S. Prange. 2012. Learning to live with black bears: a psychological model of acceptance. Journal of Wildlife Management 76: 1331–1340.
- Zar, J. H. 2007. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
- Zinn, H. C., M. J. Manfredo, and D. Decker. 2008. Human conditioning to wildlife: steps toward theory and research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 13: 388–399.
10.1080/10871200802427972 Google Scholar
- Zinn, H. C., M. J. Manfredo, and J. J. Vaske. 2000. Social psychological bases for stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 20–33.
10.1080/10871200009359185 Google Scholar
- Zinn, H. C., M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, and K. Wittmann. 1998. Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society and Natural Resources 11: 649–662.