Occupancy of freshwater turtles across a gradient of altered landscapes
Corresponding Author
Scott W. Buchanan
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorBill Buffum
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
Search for more papers by this authorGavino Puggioni
Department of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island, 9 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
Search for more papers by this authorNancy E. Karraker
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Scott W. Buchanan
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorBill Buffum
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
Search for more papers by this authorGavino Puggioni
Department of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island, 9 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
Search for more papers by this authorNancy E. Karraker
Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881 USA
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Turtles are one of the most threatened groups of vertebrates worldwide. In the northeastern United States, a legacy of centuries of dramatic landscape alteration has affected freshwater turtle populations, but the relationships between the current landscape and distributions and abundances of freshwater turtles remain poorly understood. We used a stratified random approach to select 88 small, isolated wetlands across a gradient of forest cover throughout Rhode Island, USA, and systematically sampled freshwater turtles in these wetlands. We report estimates of relative abundance and used a canonical correspondence analysis to investigate relationships between species relative abundance and environmental covariates. We also investigated which environmental covariates affect the occurrence and detection probabilities of each species. Eastern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta picta) and common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) were widespread (occurring in 83% and 63% of wetlands, respectively) and relatively abundant. Spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata) were far less common, occurring in 8% of wetlands, and exhibited a positive association with shallow wetlands surrounded by forest. Non-native red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) occurred in 10% of wetlands and exhibited a positive association with road density, likely reflecting a positive relationship between slider occurrence and human population density. Identifying landscape-scale habitat features that are associated with the occurrence of sensitive species can improve the ability of biologists to identify and protect turtle populations. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jwmg21596-sup-0001-SuppFigs-S1.docx153.7 KB | Supporting Figures S1. |
jwmg21596-sup-0002-SuppTabs-S1.xlsx39.9 KB | Supporting Tables S1. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
LITERATURE CITED
- Anthonysamy, W. J. B., M. J. Dreslik, D. Mauger, and C. A. Phillips. 2014. A preliminary assessment of habitat partitioning in a freshwater turtle community at an isolated preserve. Copeia 2014: 269–278.
- Babcock, H. L. 1919. The turtles of New England. Boston Society of Natural History, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- Baldwin, E. A., M. N. Marchand, and J. A. Litvaitis. 2004. Terrestrial habitat use by nesting painted turtles in landscapes with different levels of fragmentation. Northeastern Naturalist 11: 41–48.
- Brooks, T. M., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. DaFonseca, A. B. Rylands, W. R. Konstant, P. Flick, J. Pilgrim, S. Oldfield, G. Magin, and C. Hilton-Taylor. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16: 909–923.
- Buchanan, S. W., B. Buffum, and N. E. Karraker. 2017. Responses of a spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata) population to creation of early successional habitat. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 12: 688–700.
- Buffum, B., C. Modisette, and S. R. McWilliams. 2014. Encouraging family forest owners to create early successional wildlife habitat in southern New England. PLoS ONE 9(2): e89972.
- Burke, V. J., and J. W. Gibbons. 1995. Terrestrial buffer zones and wetland conservation: a case study of freshwater turtles in a Carolina bay. Conservation Biology 9: 1365–1369.
- Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany.
- Butler, B. J. 2013. Rhode Island's forest resources, 2012. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Butler, B. J., and B. Payton. 2011. Rhode Island's forest resources, 2009. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Colteaux, B. C., and D. M. Johnson. 2017. Commercial harvest and export of snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) in the United States: trends and the efficacy of size limits at reducing harvest. Journal for Nature Conservation 35: 13–19.
- Congdon, J. D., A. E. Dunham, and R. C. van Loben Sels. 1994. Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): implications for conservation and management of long–lived organisms. American Zoologist 34: 397–408.
- Cosentino, B. J., R. L. Schooley, and C. A. Phillips. 2010. Wetland hydrology, area, and isolation influence occupancy and spatial turnover of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Landscape Ecology 25: 1589–1600.
- Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States, 1780's to 1980's. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Dodd, K. C. 1990. Effects of habitat fragmentation on a stream-dwelling species, the flattened musk turtle Sternotherus depressus. Biological Conservation 54: 33–45.
- Dorland, A., T. Rytwinski, and L. Fahrig. 2014. Do roads reduce painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) populations? PLoS ONE 9(5): e98414.
- Drowne, F. P. 1905. The reptiles and batrachians of Rhode Island. Roger Williams Park Museum Monograph Number 15. C. Abbott Davis, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
- Enneson, J. J., and J. D. Litzgus. 2008. Using long-term data and a stage-classified matrix to assess conservation strategies for an endangered turtle (Clemmys guttata). Biological Conservation 141: 1560–1568.
-
Ernst, C. H., and
J. E. Lovich.
2009.
Turtles of the United States and Canada. Second edition.
John Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
10.56021/9780801891212 Google Scholar
- Everitt, B., and T. Hothorn. 2011. An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany.
- Failey, E. L., J. C. McCoy, S. J. Price, and M. E. Dorcas. 2007. Ecology of turtles inhabiting golf course and farm ponds in the western Piedmont of North Carolina. Journal of North Carolina Academy of Science 123: 221–232.
- Fiske, I., and R. Chandler. 2011. unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43: 1–23.
- Foley, S. M., S. J. Price, and M. E. Dorcas. 2012. Nest-site selection and nest depredation of semi-aquatic turtles on golf courses. Urban Ecosystems 15: 489–497.
- Foster, D. R., and J. D. Aber. 2004. Forests in time: the environmental consequences of 1,000 years of change in New England. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
- Gibbons, J. W., D. E. Scott, T. J. Ryan, K. A. Buhlmann, T. D. Tuberville, B. S. Metts, J. L. Greene, T. Mills, Y. Leiden, S. Poppy, and C. T. Winne. 2000. The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians. BioScience 50: 653–666.
- Gibbs, J. P. 1998. Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. Landscape Ecology 13: 263–268.
- Gibbs, J. P. 2000. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 14: 314–317.
- Gibbs, J. P., and W. G. Shriver. 2002. Estimating the effects of road mortality on turtle populations. Conservation Biology 16: 1647–1652.
- Heppell, S. S. 1998. Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 1998: 367–375.
- Janzen, F. J. 1994. Vegetational cover predicts the sex ratio of hatchling turtles in natural nests. Ecology 75: 1593–1599.
- Joyal, L. A., M. McCollough, and M. L. Hunter Jr. 2001. Landscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in southern Maine. Conservation Biology 15: 1755–1762.
- Kolbe, J. J., and F. J. Janzen. 2002. Impact of nest-site selection on nest success and nest temperature in natural and disturbed habitats. Ecology 83: 269–281.
- Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas, and M. De Poorter. 2000. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 12: 1–12.
- Lovich, J. E., J. R. Ennen, M. Agha, and J. W. Gibbons. 2018. Where have all the turtles gone, and why does it matter? BioScience 68: 771–781.
- Luiselli, L., A. Starita, G. M. Carpaneto, G. H. Segniagbeto, and G. Amori. 2016. A short review of the international trade of wild tortoises and freshwater turtles across the world and throughout two decades. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 15: 167–172.
- MacCallum, R. C., K. F. Widaman, K. J. Preacher, and S. Hong. 2001. Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research 36: 611–637.
- MacKenzie, D. I., and L. L. Bailey. 2004. Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 9: 300–318.
- MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, G. B. Lachman, S. Droege, A. J. Royle, and C. A. Langtimm. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248–2255.
- MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, J. A. Royle, K. H. Pollock, L. L. Bailey, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
- Marchand, M. N., and J. A. Litvaitis. 2004. Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Conservation Biology 18: 758–767.
-
Marzluff, J. M.
2001. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. Pages 19–47 in J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly, editors.
Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world.
Springer, New York,
New York, USA.
10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_2 Google Scholar
- McDonnell, M. J., and A. K. Hahs. 2008. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landscape Ecology 23: 1143–1155.
- Milam, J. C., and S. M. Melvin. 2001. Density, habitat use, movements, and conservation of spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata) in Massachusetts. Journal of Herpetology 35: 418–427.
- Mitchell, J. C., and M. W. Klemens. 2000. Primary and secondary effects of habitat alteration. Pages 5–32 in M. W. Klemens, editor. Turtle conservation. The Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
- National Centers for Environmental Information [NCEI]. 2016. Climate, temperature, and precipiation data for Rhode Island. <https://www.ncei.noaa.gov>. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.
- Nielsen, S. E., G. McDermid, G. B. Stenhouse, and M. S. Boyce. 2010. Dynamic wildlife habitat models: seasonal foods and mortality risk predict occupancy-abundance and habitat selection in grizzly bears. Biological Conservation 143: 1623–1634.
- Price, S. J., J. Guzy, L. Witczak, and M. E. Dorcas. 2013. Do ponds on golf courses provide suitable habitat for wetland-dependent animals in suburban areas? An assessment of turtle abundances. Journal of Herpetology 47: 243–250.
- Rasmussen, M. L., and J. D. Litzgus. 2010. Habitat selection and movement patterns of spotted turtles (Clemmys guttata): effects of spatial and temporal scales of analyses. Copeia 2010: 86–96.
- Rector, D. D. 1981. Soil survey of Rhode Island. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. 2015. Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan. < http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/fish-wildlife>. Accessed 30 september 2018.
- Rhode Island Geographic Information System [RIGIS]. 2013. University of Rhode Island Environmental Data Center. <http://www.rigis.org>. Accessed 15 Mar 2013.
- Riem, J. G., R. B. Blair, D. N. Pennington, and N. G. Solomon. 2012. Estimating mammalian species diversity across an urban gradient. American Midland Naturalist 168: 315–332.
- Rizkalla, C. E., and R. K. Swihart. 2006. Community structure and differential responses of aquatic turtles to agriculturally induced habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 21: 1361–1375.
- Semlitsch, R. D., and J. R. Bodie. 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17: 1219–1228.
- Shiping, G., W. Jichao, S. Haitao, S. Riheng, and X. Rumei. 2006. Illegal trade and conservation requirements of freshwater turtles in Nanmao, Hainan Provence, China. Oryx 40: 331–336.
- Storer, D. H. 1840. Reptiles of Massachusetts. Dutton and Wentworth, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Petition to list spotted turtle in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Federal Register Docket ID FWS–R5–ES–2015–0064.
- van Dijk, P. P. 2011. Clemmys guttata. The IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. <http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/4965/0>. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
- van Dijk, P. P., and J. Harding. 2011. Glyptemys insculpta. IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. <http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/4968/0>. Accessed 15 March 2017.
- Winchell, K. M., and J. P. Gibbs. 2016. Golf courses as habitat for aquatic turtles in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 147: 59–70.