Evaluation of the Umbrella Species Concept at Fine Spatial Scales
Corresponding Author
Natasha L. Barlow
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher P. Kirol
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorKevin E. Doherty
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd 400, Lakewood, CO, 80228 USA
Search for more papers by this authorBradley C. Fedy
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Natasha L. Barlow
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher P. Kirol
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorKevin E. Doherty
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd 400, Lakewood, CO, 80228 USA
Search for more papers by this authorBradley C. Fedy
University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Declines in the spatial extent of the sagebrush ecosystem have prompted the consideration of conservation efforts that view the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) as an umbrella species at landscape scales. Conservation strategies that focus on an umbrella species, however, may have unintended negative consequences for co-occurring species at finer scales. In North America, grassland and shrubland songbird populations are declining faster than other avian groups. Conservation of sage-grouse habitats may protect songbird habitats where distributions overlap. To assess the umbrella species concept at fine scales, we quantified nest-site selection for a sagebrush-obligate songbird, the Brewer's sparrow (Spizella breweri). We then compared the fine-scale habitat variables that influenced Brewer's sparrow nest-site selection with fine-scale nest-site selection for sage-grouse in the Powder River Basin region of northeastern Wyoming, USA. We modeled nest-site selection using conditional logistic regression for Brewer's sparrow (2016–2017) and logistic regression for sage-grouse (2004–2007). Both species selected nest sites with higher visual obstruction, shrub height, and branching density, although the selection for higher shrub height was stronger for sage-grouse. Brewer's sparrows selected nest shrubs with higher percentage of living foliage (vigor), and the opposite was shown for sage-grouse. At the nest site, based on the variables we measured, our results suggest that Brewer's sparrows and sage-grouse select for similar habitat attributes, with the exception of shrub vigor of the nest shrub. The stronger selection for more vigorous shrubs in Brewer's sparrows may be because they nest in shrubs, rather than on the ground under shrubs (as in sage-grouse). Most of the conservation objectives for protection of sage-grouse habitats appear to be beneficial or inconsequential for Brewer's sparrow. Local habitat management for sage-grouse as a proxy for conservation of other species may be justified if the microhabitat preferences of the species under the umbrella are understood to avoid unintentional negative effects. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.
LITERATURE CITED
- Arnold, T. W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's Information Criterion. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1175–1178.
- Baker, M. F., R. L. Eng, J. S. Gashwiler, M. H. Schroeder, and C. E. Braun. 1976. Conservation committee report on effects of alteration of sagebrush communities on the associated avifauna. Wilson Bulletin 88: 165–171.
- Beck, J. L., J. W. Connelly, and C. L. Wambolt. 2012. Consequences of treating Wyoming big sagebrush to enhance wildlife habitats. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65: 444–455.
- Best, L. B. 1972. First-year effects of sagebrush control on two sparrows. Journal of Wildlife Management 36: 534–544.
- BirdLife International. 2018. Spizella breweri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018:e.T22734705A131891030.
- Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
- Canfield, R. H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39: 388–394.
- Carlisle, J. D., A. D. Chalfoun, K. T. Smith, and J. L. Beck. 2018a. Nontarget effects on songbirds from habitat manipulation for greater sage-grouse: implications for the umbrella species concept. Condor 120: 439–455.
- Carlisle, J. D., D. A. Keinath, S. E. Albeke, and A. D. Chalfoun. 2018b. Identifying holes in the greater sage-grouse conservation umbrella. Journal of Wildlife Management 82: 948–957.
- Chalfoun, A. D., and T. E. Martin. 2007. Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of fitness. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 983–992.
- Chalfoun, A. D., and T. E. Martin. 2009. Habitat structure mediates predation risk for sedentary prey: experimental tests of alternative hypotheses. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 497–503.
- Chalfoun, A. D., and T. E. Martin. 2010. Facultative nest patch shifts in response to nest predation risk in the Brewer's sparrow: a “win-stay, lose-switch” strategy? Oecologia 163: 885–892.
- Coates, P. S., and D. J. Delehanty. 2010. Nest predation of greater sage-grouse in relation to microhabitat factors and predators. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 240–248.
- Coates, P. S., M. A. Ricca, B. G. Prochazka, M. L. Brooks, K. E. Doherty, T. Kroger, E. J. Blomberg, C. A. Hagen, and M. L. Casazza. 2016. Wildfire, climate, and invasive grass interactions negatively impact an indicator species by reshaping sagebrush ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 12745–12750.
- Compton, B. W., J. M. Rhymer, and M. McCollough. 2002. Habitat selection by wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta): an application of paired logistic regression. Ecology 83: 833–843.
- Connelly, J. W., S. T. Knick, C. E. Braun, W. L. Baker, E. A. Beever, T. Christiansen, M. A. Schroeder, S. J. Stiver, B. L. Walker, and M. J. Wisdom. 2011. Conservation of greater sage-grouse: a synthesis of current trends and future management. Pages 549–563 in S. T. Knick and J. W. Connelly, editors. Greater sage-grouse ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
10.1525/california/9780520267114.003.0025 Google Scholar
- Connelly, J. W., S. T. Knick, M. Schroeder, and S. J. Stiver. 2004. Conservation assessment of greater sage-grouse and sagebrush habitats. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
- Connelly, J. W., K. P. Reese, and M. A. Schroeder. 2003. Monitoring of greater sage-grouse habitats and populations. College of Natural Resources Experiment Station Bulletin 80, University of Idaho, Moscow, USA.
10.5962/bhl.title.153828 Google Scholar
- Connelly, J. W., M. A. Schroeder, A. R. Sands, and C. E. Braun. 2000. Guidelines to manage sage-grouse populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 967–985.
- Conover, M. R., and A. J. Roberts. 2016. Declining populations of greater sage-grouse: where and why. Human-Wildlife Interactions 10: 217–229.
- Copeland, H. E., H. Sawyer, K. L. Monteith, D. E. Naugle, A. Pocewicz, N. Graf, and M. J. Kauffman. 2014. Conserving migratory mule deer through the umbrella of sage-grouse. Ecosphere 5: 117.
- Daubenmire, R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33: 43–64.
- Dinkins, J. B., K. T. Smith, J. L. Beck, C. P. Kirol, A. C. Pratt, and M. R. Conover. 2016. Microhabitat conditions in Wyoming's sage-grouse core areas: effects on nest site selection and success. PLoS ONE 11:e0150798.
- Doherty, K. E., J. L. Beck, and D. E. Naugle. 2011a. Comparing ecological site descriptions to habitat characteristics influencing greater sage-grouse nest site occurrence and success. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64: 344–351.
- Doherty, K. E., J. S. Evans, P. S. Coates, L. M. Juliusson, and B. C. Fedy. 2016. Importance of regional variation in conservation planning: a rangewide example of the greater sage-grouse. Ecosphere 7:e01462.
- Doherty, K. E., D. E. Naugle, H. E. Copeland, A. Pocewicz, and J. M. Kiesecker. 2011b. Energy development and conservation tradeoffs: systematic planning for greater sage-grouse in their eastern range. Pages 505–516 in S. T. Knick and J. W. Connelly, editors. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
- Doherty, K. E., D. Naugle, and B. Walker. 2010a. Greater sage-grouse nesting habitat: the importance of managing at multiple scales. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1544–1553.
- Doherty, K. E., D. E. Naugle, B. L. Walker, and J. M. Graham. 2008. Greater sage-grouse winter habitat selection and energy development. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 187–195.
- Doherty, K. E., J. D. Tack, J. S. Evans, and D. E. Naugle. 2010b. Mapping breeding densities of greater sage-grouse: a tool for range-wide conservation planning. BLM completion report: Interagency agreement #L10PG00911. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bismarck, North Dakota, USA.
- Donnelly, J. P., J. D. Tack, K. E. Doherty, D. E. Naugle, B. W. Allred, and V. J. Dreitz. 2017. Extending conifer removal and landscape protection strategies from sage-grouse to songbirds, a range-wide assessment. Rangeland Ecology and Management 70: 95–105.
- Dumroese, R. K., T. Luna, B. A. Richardson, F. F. Kilkenny, and J. B. Runyon. 2015. Conserving and restoring habitat for greater sage-grouse and other sagebrush-obligate wildlife: the crucial link of forbs and sagebrush diversity. Native Plants Journal 16: 276–299.
10.3368/npj.16.3.276 Google Scholar
- Fedy, B. C., K. E. Doherty, C. L. Aldridge, M. O'Donnell, J. L. Beck, B. Bedrosian, D. Gummer, M. J. Holloran, G. D. Johnson, N. W. Kaczor, et al. 2014. Habitat prioritization across large landscapes, multiple seasons, and novel areas: an example using greater sage-grouse in Wyoming. Wildlife Monographs 190: 1–39.
- Fedy, B. C., C. P. Kirol, A. L. Sutphin, and T. L. Maechtle. 2015. The influence of mitigation on sage-grouse habitat selection within an energy development field. PLoS ONE 10:e0121603.
- Finch, D. M., D. A. Boyce, J. C. Chambers, C. J. Colt, R. K. Dumroese, S. G. Kitchen, C. McCarthy, S. E. Meyer, B. A. Richardson, M. M. Rowland, et al. 2016. Conservation and restoration of sagebrush ecosystems and sage-grouse: an assessment of USDA Forest Service science. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-348. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
- Gibson, D., E. J. Blomberg, and J. S. Sedinger. 2016. Evaluating vegetation effects on animal demographics: the role of plant phenology and sampling bias. Ecology and Evolution 6: 3621–3631.
- Gilbert, M. M., and A. D. Chalfoun. 2011. Energy development affects populations of sagebrush songbirds in Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management 75: 816–824.
- Golding, J. D., and V. J. Dreitz. 2017. Songbird response to rest-rotation and season-long cattle grazing in a grassland sagebrush ecosystem. Journal of Environmental Management 204: 605–612.
- Hagen, C. A. 2011. Predation on greater sage-grouse: facts, process, and effects. Pages 95–100 in S. T. Knick and J. W. Connelly, editors. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
10.1525/california/9780520267114.003.0007 Google Scholar
- Hagen, C. A., J. W. Connelly, and M. A. Schroeder. 2007. A meta-analysis of greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus nesting and brood-rearing habitats. Wildlife Biology 13: 42–50.
- Hanser, S. E., and S. T. Knick. 2011. Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for shrubland passerine birds: a multiscale assessment. Pages 457–488 in S. T. Knick and J. W. Connelly, editors. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
10.1525/california/9780520267114.003.0020 Google Scholar
- Hanski, I. 2011. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40: 248–255.
- Hansley, P. L., and G. P. Beauvais. 2004. Species assessment for Brewer's sparrow (Spizella breweri) in Wyoming. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
- Harrison, M. L., and D. J. Green. 2010. Vegetation influences patch occupancy but not settlement and dispersal decisions in a declining migratory songbird. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 148–160.
- Hess, J. E., and J. L. Beck. 2012. Burning and mowing wyoming big sagebrush: do treated sites meet minimum guidelines for greater sage-grouse breeding habitats? Wildlife Society Bulletin 36: 85–93.
- Hethcoat, M. G., and A. D. Chalfoun. 2015a. Towards a mechanistic understanding of human-induced rapid environmental change: a case study linking energy development, nest predation and predators. Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 1492–1499.
- Hethcoat, M. G., and A. D. Chalfoun. 2015b. Energy development and avian nest survival in Wyoming, USA: a test of a common disturbance index. Biological Conservation 184: 327–334.
- Holloran, M. J., B. J. Heath, A. G. Lyon, S. J. Slater, L. Kuipers, and S. H. Anderson. 2005. Greater sage-grouse nesting habitat selection and success in Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 638–649.
- Holmes, A. L., J. D. Maestas, and D. E. Naugle. 2017. Bird responses to removal of western juniper in sagebrush-steppe. Rangeland Ecology and Management 70: 87–94.
- Homer, C. G., G. Xian, C. L. Aldridge, D. K. Meyer, T. R. Loveland, and M. S. O'Donnell. 2015. Forecasting sagebrush ecosystem components and greater sage-grouse habitat for 2050: learning from past climate patterns and Landsat imagery to predict the future. Ecological Indicators 55: 131–145.
- Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
10.1002/0471722146 Google Scholar
- Hunter, M., M. Westgate, P. Barton, A. Calhoun, J. Pierson, A. Tulloch, M. Beger, C. Branquinho, T. Caro, J. Gross, et al. 2016. Two roles for ecological surrogacy: indicator surrogates and management surrogates. Ecological Indicators 63: 121–125.
- Hutto, R. L. 1985. Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds. Pages 455–476 in M. L. Cody, editor. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
- Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71.
- Kirol, C. P., J. L. Beck, J. B. Dinkins, and M. R. Conover. 2012. Microhabitat selection for nesting and brood-rearing by the greater sage-grouse in xeric big sagebrush. Condor 114: 75–89.
- Kirol, C. P., A. L. Sutphin, L. Bond, M. R. Fuller, and T. L. Maechtle. 2015. Mitigation effectiveness for improving nesting success of greater sage-grouse influenced by energy development. Wildlife Biology 21: 98–109.
- S. T. Knick, and J. W. Connelly, editors. 2011. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology 38. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
- Knick, S. T., D. S. Dobkin, J. T. Rotenberry, M. A. Schroeder, M. Van Heagen, and C. van Riper III. 2003. Teetering on the edge or too late? Conservation and research issues for avifauna of sagebrush habitats. Condor 105: 611–634.
- Knight, E. C., N. A. Mahony, and D. J. Green. 2016. Effects of agricultural fragmentation on the bird community in sagebrush shrubsteppe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223: 278–288.
- Knopf, F. L., J. A. Sedgwick, and D. B. Inkley. 1990. Regional correspondence among shrubsteppe bird habitats. Condor 92: 45–53.
- Krausman, P. R. 1999. Some basic principles of habitat use. Pages 85–90 in K. L. Launchbaugh, K. D. Sander, and J. C. Mosley, editors. Grazing behavior of livestock and wildlife. Station Bulletin 70. Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, USA.
- Lockyer, Z. B., P. S. Coates, M. L. Casazza, S. Espinosa, and D. J. Delehanty. 2015. Nest-site selection and reproductive success of greater sage-grouse in a fire-affected habitat of northwestern Nevada. Journal of Wildlife Management 79: 785–797.
- Mahony, N. A., W. M. Vander Haegen, B. L. Walker, and P. G. Krannitz. 2001. Male incubation and multiple brooding in sagebrush Brewer's sparrows. Wilson Bulletin 113: 441–444.
- Meyer, C. B., and W. Thuiller. 2006. Accuracy of resource selection functions across spatial scales. Diversity and Distributions 12: 288–297.
- Miller, R., S. Knick, D. Pyke, C. Meinke, S. Hanser, M. Widsom, and A. Hild. 2011. Characteristics of sagebrush habitats and limitations to long-term conservation. Pages 145–184 in S. T. Knick and J. W. Connelly, editors. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
10.1525/california/9780520267114.003.0011 Google Scholar
- Paczek, S., and P. Krannitz. 2005. The importance of floristics to sagebrush breeding birds of the South Okanagan and Similkameen Valleys, British Columbia. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Asilomar, California, USA.
- Petersen, L., and L. Best. 1985. Brewer's sparrow nest-site characteristics in a sagebrush community. Association of Field Ornithology 56: 23–27.
- R Core Team. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
- Ralph, C. J., T. E. Martin, G. R. Geupel, D. F. DeSante, and P. Pyle. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station General Technical Report PSW-GTR- 144, Albany, California, USA.
- Reynolds, T. 1981. Nesting of the sage thrasher, sage sparrow, and Brewer's sparrow in southeastern Idaho. Condor 83: 61–64.
- Rich, T. 1980. Nest placement in sage thrashers, sage sparrows and Brewer's sparrows. Wilson Bulletin 92: 362–368.
- Rich, T. D., M. J. Wisdom, and V. A. Saab. 2005. Conservation of priority birds in sagebrush ecosystems. Pages 589–606 in C. J. Ralph and T. D. Rich, editors. Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW 191, Albany, California, USA.
- Ricklefs, R. E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9: 1–48.
10.5479/si.00810282.9 Google Scholar
- Robel, R. J., J. N. Briggs, A. D. Dayton, and L. C. Hulbert. 1970. Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. Journal of Range Management 23: 295–297.
- Roberge, J. M., and P. Angelstam. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18: 76–85.
- Rosenberg, K. V., J. A. Kennedy, R. Dettmers, R. P. Ford, D. Reynolds, J. D. Alexander, C. J. Beardmore, P. J. Blancher, R. E. Bogart, G. S. Butcher, et al. 2016. Partners in flight landbird conservation plan: 2016 revision for Canada and Continental United States. Partners in Flight Science Committee.
- Rotenberry, J. T., M. A. Patten, and K. L. Preston. 1999. Brewer's sparrow (Spizella breweri). Account 390in A. F. Poole and F. B. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA.
- Rotenberry, J. T., and J. A. Wiens. 1980. Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61: 1228–1250.
- Rotenberry, J. T., and J. A. Wiens. 1989. Reproductive biology of shrubsteppe passerine birds: geographical and temporal variation in clutch size, brood size, and fledging success. Condor 91: 1–14.
- Rowland, M. M., M. J. Wisdom, L. H. Suring, and C. W. Meinke. 2006. Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates. Biological Conservation 129: 323–335.
- Ruehmann, M. B., M. J. Desmond, and W. R. Gould. 2011. Effects of smooth brome on Brewer's sparrow nest survival in sagebrush steppe. Condor 113: 419–428.
- Sanders, L. E., and A. D. Chalfoun. 2019. Mechanisms underlying increased nest predation in natural gas fields: a test of the mesopredator release hypothesis. Ecosphere 10:e02738.
- Schroeder, M. A., J. R. Young, and C. E. Braun. 1999. Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Account 425 in A. F. Poole and F. B. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. Second edition. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA.
- Smith, J. T., J. D. Tack, K. E. Doherty, B. W. Allred, J. D. Maestas, L. I. Berkeley, S. J. Dettenmaier, T. A. Messmer, and D. E. Naugle. 2018. Phenology largely explains taller grass at successful nests in greater sage-grouse. Ecology and Evolution 8: 356–364.
- Smith, K. T., and J. L. Beck. 2018. Sagebrush treatments influence annual population change for greater sage-grouse. Restoration Ecology 26: 497–505.
- Smith, K. T., C. P. Kirol, J. L. Beck, and F. C. Blomquist. 2014. Prioritizing winter habitat quality for greater sage-grouse in a landscape influenced by energy development. Ecosphere 5: 15.
- Suter, W., R. F. Graf, and R. Hess. 2002. Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conservation Biology 16: 778–788.
- U.S. Department of the Interior. 2015. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding on a petition to list greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as an endangered or threatened species. Federal Register 80: 59858–59942.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2008. Birds of conservation concern 2008. USFWS, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2013. Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) conservation objectives: final report. USFWS, Denver, Colorado, USA.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2015. Technical reference on using surrogate species for landscape conservation. USFWS, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Vander Haegen, W. M. 2007. Fragmention by agriculture influences reproductive success of birds in a shrubsteppe landscape. Ecological Applications 17: 934–947.
- Walker, B. L., D. E. Naugle, and K. E. Doherty. 2007. Greater sage-grouse population response to energy development and habitat loss. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 2644–2654.
- Wambolt, C. L., M. R. Frisina, S. J. Knapp, and R. Margaret. 2006. Effect of method, site, and taxon on line-intercept estimates of sagebrush cover. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 440–445.
- Welstead, K., P. Krannitz, and N. Mahony. 2005. Using survival analysis of artificial and real Brewer's sparrow (Spizella breweri breweri) nests to model site level and nest site factors associated with nest success in the South Okanagan region of Canada. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California, USA.
- Williams, O. 1959. Food habits of the deer mouse. Journal of Mammalogy 40: 415–419.
10.2307/1376568 Google Scholar
Citing Literature
February 2020
Pages 237-248