Volume 82, Issue 2 p. 424-434
Research Article

Roost selection by bats in buildings, Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Kirstin E. Fagan

Kirstin E. Fagan

Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Emma V. Willcox

Corresponding Author

Emma V. Willcox

Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Liem T. Tran

Liem T. Tran

Department of Geography, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Riley F. Bernard

Riley F. Bernard

Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA

Current Affiliation: Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Pennsylvania, State College, PA 16802–2128, USA.Search for more papers by this author
William H. Stiver

William H. Stiver

Great Smoky Mountains National Park, National Park Service, Gatlinburg, TN 37738-4102, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 October 2017
Citations: 17

ABSTRACT

Bats roosting in buildings are a challenge for wildlife managers because of their conservation needs, capacity to transmit disease, and potential to damage structures. An understanding of roost selection by bats in buildings is important for effective management but was lacking in the southeastern United States. During 2015 and 2016, we surveyed 140 buildings in Great Smoky Mountains National Park in eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina, USA for bats, identifying 48 roost sites and detecting 5 species. We compared the microclimate conditions, building features, and habitat patch characteristics of buildings used and unused by bats using an information-theoretic approach. Averaged parameter estimates from logistic regression models developed with survey data indicated bat presence was more likely in old buildings with dark conditions surrounded by low road density. Of all roost buildings surveyed, 65.9% were accessed regularly by tourists and 68.2% were managed as historical structures. We present alternative management strategies that may be implemented to ensure human health and safety and preserve historical sites while protecting bats during the reproductive period. © 2017 The Wildlife Society.